<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Articles by Mark George</title>
	<atom:link href="http://articles.markgeorge.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://articles.markgeorge.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Betta Fish Snob</title>
		<link>http://articles.markgeorge.net/pets/betta-fish-snob/</link>
		<comments>http://articles.markgeorge.net/pets/betta-fish-snob/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betta splendens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bettas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half moon betta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.markgeorge.net/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
What is a &#8220;true&#8221; half moon betta? Perhaps that&#8217;s only a question a betta fish snob would ask, or answer. You didn&#8217;t know there was such a thing as a betta fish snob? Well, all snobbery aside, the question is really answered by the market place, for it is the most highly prized half moon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="body">
<p>What is a &#8220;true&#8221; half moon betta? Perhaps that&#8217;s only a question a betta fish snob would ask, or answer. You didn&#8217;t know there was such a thing as a betta fish snob? Well, all snobbery aside, the question is really answered by the market place, for it is the most highly prized half moon betta fish characteristics that bring the highest prices. Often those prices can be thousands of dollars. For such a little fish you ask? And how long is he going to live anyway, three years on average, maybe five years at the outside? But that prized betta could father thousands of other little prize winning bettas during that time. That&#8217;s what betta breeders are thinking and that&#8217;s why you might want to know what they look for. So let&#8217;s look at what the experts look at.</p>
<p>Those big halfmoon shaped fins are awfully pretty. But what makes one beautiful halfmoon betta prettier than another? To the discerning betta lover it is the subtleties of form and tone. Of primary importance is that the caudal fin (the tail) forms a full half moon shape. It should spread more than 180 degrees and it should touch and overlap the dorsal fin and anal fin so that there is almost a full circle of finnage around the betta fish when he is flaring. Now look at the edges of the caudal fin. Are they nice and straight with sharp corners? Or are they a little less well defined and rounded? The latter is rather common. The former can mean a possible prize winner.</p>
<p>Moving on from the subtleties of fin form we look at the obvious feature of color. There are many striking color combinations and the more exotic and rare they are the more they command prizes and premium prices. Sometimes the color of a betta is given a little help by calling it something exotic sounding, like steel blue or dark melano. Some beautiful color combinations create marble effects and two tones like silver/red. Particularly rare and hard to achieve even in carefully controlled breeding programs are half moon bettas with perfect finnage and a single pure color tone without any other color splotches. That&#8217;s a champion and a pricey fish if you can produce it, and license to become a betta fish snob.</p></div>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4296091087070103";
/* Footer ad for single posts, 728x90, created 6/25/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8378355771";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.markgeorge.net/pets/betta-fish-snob/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fight Junk Science &#8211; Solar Panel Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://articles.markgeorge.net/science/fight-junk-science-solar-panel-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://articles.markgeorge.net/science/fight-junk-science-solar-panel-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concentrating solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.markgeorge.net/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever something technical becomes popular, junk science appears. Solar energy is one of those subjects littered with junk science. Junk science is often behind the specifications given for solar energy systems, such as the key figure of efficiency. Sales people are very creative in how they specify the efficiency of the system they are trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever something technical becomes popular, junk science appears. Solar energy is one of those subjects littered with junk science. Junk science is often behind the specifications given for solar energy systems, such as the key figure of <em>efficiency</em>. Sales people are very creative in how they specify the efficiency of the system they are trying to sell you. They may talk about the conversion efficiency of their solar cells in a photovoltaic (PV) system, or the efficiency of the power inverter that converts the DC output from solar cells or batteries to AC for use in the home, or the optical efficiency of the mirrors in a concentrating solar power system. Those are important numbers for the system designer, but not for the end user. So ignore all that and look at the basic measure of efficiency.</p>
<p>The basic measure of efficiency of any energy conversion system such as solar is simply the output power divided by the input power, a simple ratio that must always be less than one. Simple. You just need to know those two numbers. Normally the output power is readily available. It&#8217;s usually the first spec given by the data sheet for the system or by the salesman. But what about the input power? Although the marketing types might make it sound complicated and mysterious, determining the input power is very simple.</p>
<p>The input power is the amount of solar power striking the collection area. There are two numbers you need to know to figure that out, the size of the collection area, and the amount of solar power per unit area striking the earth&#8217;s surface. The size of the collection area is easy to calculate. It&#8217;s the size of the solar panel, that is, length times width (for a rectangular solar panel which is typical). The second number is even easier to obtain because it is a well established number for the amount of solar power that strikes the surface of the earth. That number is 1,000 watts per square meter of direct normal solar insolation at sea level. The number varies somewhat depending on your altitude and weather conditions. And depending on the type of collector the solar energy system uses there may be some other contributors to the total energy collected. But this standard number is sufficiently accurate for use in evaluating solar energy systems.</p>
<p>So how might this knowledge be useful to you? Here is a real example. At the time of this writing there is a company demonstrating a solar panel with a claimed output power of 3,000 watts. The company claims they have breakthrough technology that makes it many times more efficient than existing solar panels available from other companies. They are seeking investors to help them build a factory and ramp up production. Sounds like a hot investment, doesn&#8217;t it? Let&#8217;s look at the basics of their product.</p>
<p>The solar panel being demonstrated measures 3 feet by 5 feet. That is 15 square feet or 1.39 square meters. So the maximum input power available, based on that standard number of 1,000 watts per square meter of solar energy striking the earth&#8217;s surface, is 1.39 X 1,000 = 1,390 watts. The claimed output power is 3,000 watts. So the efficiency is 3000/1390 = 2.16 or 216%. <strong>That&#8217;s impossible</strong>. Efficiency can never be greater than one. You cannot get more power out than you put into an energy conversion system. I just saved myself from making a very bad investment!</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4296091087070103";
/* Footer ad for single posts, 728x90, created 6/25/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8378355771";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Author&#8217;s note: The term &#8220;insolation&#8221; in the third paragraph is not a misspelling.  That is the term for solar radiation received at the earth&#8217;s surface. If you view this article at EzineArticles.com you will see that word is incorrectly written as &#8220;insulation&#8221;. Upon first submission of the article I noticed that term had been changed so I submitted it again, and again it was changed. It seems EZA wouldn&#8217;t take my submission as is but insisted on doing a spell check and, in this case, incorrectly changed the spelling of an important term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.markgeorge.net/science/fight-junk-science-solar-panel-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of foreign transaction fees</title>
		<link>http://articles.markgeorge.net/finance/mind-those-foreign-transfer-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://articles.markgeorge.net/finance/mind-those-foreign-transfer-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.markgeorge.net/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re anticipating a trip overseas for medical treatment, or even just an overseas vacation, it pays to know before-hand that there is a big variation in the fees you may pay on foreign purchases and money changing. It’s easy to get burned by fees that U.S. banks and credit card companies tack on to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="See this article at Ezine Articles" href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Avoid-Bank-Fees-While-Traveling&amp;id=599318" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" title="As Featured On Ezine Articles" src="http://EzineArticles.com/featured/images/ea_featured_70_3.gif" alt="" width="70" height="70" /></a>If you&#8217;re anticipating a trip overseas for medical treatment, or even just an overseas vacation, it pays to know before-hand that there is a big variation in the fees you may pay on foreign purchases and money changing. It’s easy to get burned by fees that U.S. banks and credit card companies tack on to your overseas purchases.</p>
<p>You probably know all about the ATM fees your bank charges. But you may be in for a surprise if your bank adds an additional 3% “foreign exchange” fee on top of that. That’s pretty common so it pays to check the list first and go with the bank that has competitive rates.  The same applies to your credit card. Some credit card companies charge as much as a 3% adder for overseas purchases while there is at least one company that charges a 0% adder and gives the best available exchange rate on the day of purchase.</p>
<div><strong>ATM Withdrawals</strong></div>
<p>In many countries using your ATM card is convenient, safe and you receive a better exchange rate than cash or travelers checks. In Thailand, for example. ATMs are plentiful throughout the country, even in small cities, and there is no local ATM fee charged. Changing cash or travelers checks is convenient only in heart of the major tourist destinations and only during opening hours of the exchange windows. Elsewhere you’ll need to visit a bank branch during normal banking hours. So use your ATM. But check this list first:</p>
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%;" align="center"><strong>Bank</strong></td>
<td style="width: 50%;" align="center"><strong>Foreign Exchange Fee</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Citibank</p>
<p>WaMu</p>
<p>Fidelity Investments</p>
<p>Bank of America</p>
<p>CapitalOne</p>
<p>Chase</p>
<p>E*Trade</p>
<p>HSBC</p>
<p>PayPal</p>
<p>Wells Fargo</td>
<td align="center">3%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>0%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>0%</p>
<p>3.5%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The fees charged by the first three banks in this list are from my own recent personal experience. I got burned by the Citibank 3% fee when they changed their fee structure in late 2006. When you make a sizable withdrawal that 3% fee ends up being far more than any normal ATM fees. WaMu <img src="http://www.ftjcfx.com/image-557461-10436888" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> (that’s the online banking division of Washington Mutual) has a competitive 1% foreign exchange fee. I call this the “standard” fee because it is the fee that Visa international charges on foreign money transactions and the banks charge this fee to recoup that cost. Interestingly, although the Fidelity representative I spoke with said that this 1% fee is included for ATM withdrawals from a Fidelity core account I have made many withdrawals and there is <strong>no fee</strong>. Is this a mistake? Probably not. Perhaps it is related to the type of account, such as a Premium Services account. The other notable point is that many ATM withdrawals from Fidelity and WaMu within a few minutes of one another always show a 0.3% better exchange rate from Fidelity. So somebody seems to be “skimming” on the WaMu withdrawals, although it’s pretty small.</p>
<p>Note that most banks list the “foreign exchange fee” as a separate item on your statement so it’s easy to see how much they are charging. If your bank doesn’t then it’s probably buried in a reduced exchange rate so check the rate they are giving you carefully. Since exchange rates fluctuate it is sometimes it is difficult to confirm the exact amount of the fee.</p>
<p>Ok, so when you are traveling use your ATM card but be sure to pick the right bank to avoid getting burned on those fees. Remember, there are two types of fees your bank might charge, “ATM fees” and “foreign exchange fees”. They both can add up so check it out.</p>
<div><strong>Credit Cards</strong></div>
<p>Now for credit cards the story is similar. Different issuers charge different fees on overseas purchases made with your credit card. But the fees on credit card purchases are lumped in with the purchase price so it’s more difficult to determine exactly what they are. Here’s what my research has uncovered:</p>
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 60%;" align="center"><strong>Bank and/or Card Type</strong></td>
<td style="width: 40%;" align="center"><strong>Foreign Exchange Fee</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Chase Visa</p>
<p>Citibank Visa</p>
<p>CapitalOne Visa</p>
<p>American Express</p>
<p>Bank of America Visa/MC/Amex</p>
<p>E*Trace Visa</p>
<p>HSBC Visa</p>
<p>WaMu Providian</p>
<p>Wells Fargo Visa</td>
<td align="center">3%</p>
<p>3%</p>
<p>0%</p>
<p>2%</p>
<p>3%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>3%</p>
<p>1%</p>
<p>3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Again, the fees for the first three credit card issuers in that list are from my personal experience. What seems sort of amazing is that CapitalOne somehow absorbs the 1% Visa money exchange fee. So purchases I have made on the same day with my Chase Visa and my CapitalOne Visa show a 3% difference in the exchange rate.</p>
<p>There is another little trick that you need to watch out for when you make credit card purchases. Some merchants will offer to charge your purchase in your home country currency rather than the local currency. From what I have experienced and read this is always a rip off. They’ll give you a much lower exchange rate than Visa will when the transaction books. You’ll usually get this offer from large merchants who have many foreign tourists, including the large private hospitals. It’s easy to avoid. Just be aware of it, decline the offer, and be sure the purchase is charged in the local currency.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Offshore versus Onshore Exchange Rates</strong></p>
<p>Here’s one more important tip about exchanging money. This definitely applies to Thailand and may apply to some other countries. There are really two exchange rates. The so-called “offshore rate” is what you will get if you purchase Thai money outside of Thailand. This rate is about 10% lower than the “onshore rate”. That’s huge, a 10% difference. So wait until you arrive in Thailand to exchange money. You are getting ripped if you do it at your departure airport. There are exchange booths and ATMs all over the airport in Bangkok so you’ll have no trouble changing money when you arrive no matter what time it is.</p>
<p>This issue can be particularly important if you are transferring money by bank wire from a U.S. bank to a bank in Thailand. A lot of expats who are purchasing retirement homes in Thailand are finding this out the hard way. Typically the U.S. bank is going to give you the offshore rate and you are going to get ripped off big time. But the picture is a little fuzzy now because there have been reports of people doing bank wires from U.S. banks to Thai banks and receiving the onshore rate. In particular, a recent bank wire from WaMu to Bangkok Bank was completed at the full onshore rate, and on top of that there were no fees on either end. That’s worth investigating if you are in that situation.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4296091087070103";
/* Footer ad for single posts, 728x90, created 6/25/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8378355771";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Author&#8217;s note: Since this article was published in June 2007 a number of things have changed. The onshore and offshore conversion rates have converged, most Thai banks have started charging a rather large ATM fee, and there is a class action suit against credit card companies over their foreign transaction fees. There could be follow up articles on each of these topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://articles.markgeorge.net/finance/mind-those-foreign-transfer-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
